My reply to Sen. Boxer's reply to my statement re: nytimes weaklings
Sen. Boxer:
Thank you for sending me your position on "redeployment". The length of my orig. message could have confused your staffer. I am a one-time very fervent democrat who did vote for you. Now, after learning much more and listening to you and the others of the demo attack machine, I realize the greatest enemy to the hopes, dreams and freedom of the Iraqi People is you and American liberals generally!
The nytimes indeed has expressed it's racist hatred for the Iraqi People daily now for years as it subjugates the good of Iraq to it's/your blind hatred for George Bush. You and the so-called journalist establishment, ABC, BBC, NBC, CBS, PBS, CNN, MSNBC, nytimes, latimes, etc. desperately want to hide the good news from Iraq and the good the US is doing there, and loudly trumpet al Qeada's message! I consider you to be an honorary member of al Qeada for your strenuous efforts on their behalf!
Now that I have become civilized and left the left, I wonder what it is that causes you to want so many innocent people to die at the hands of gunmen from the tenth century? Why you want to extend the rule of Saddam or his many clones there? Why you want to extend the tenth century cruelties toward women, Christians, Jews, all non-Moslems, gays, etc.? Why do you want to kill the weakest of Middle East minorities, using your friends, the tenth century gunmen, to do your killing for you? Essentially, why do you want to sacrifice the Iraqi People to these vicious killers (who would kill you in a heartbeat) when you . . . say you are a champion of women's rights? Is it that Iraqi women (and men) just don't count . . . that they are sub-human and it's just ok to let them die because, . . . "well, it's just easier that way?"
In my greater maturity, working with kids as a teacher I have learned more of what human rights truly are, as opposed to the shallow, reflexively politics based, well-meaning bullshit we "learned" in college. I now recognize you as an accomplice to mass murder . . you're like a surgeon who feels that the cancer has every right to live too, so it's just incorrect, politically incorrect, to operate, . . . so you say, "Hey, let's just let this one go, these Iraqi people aren't impotant; they can just die!" . . . their life and freedom do not serve your marxist god's world imeritives, do they?
We all know that "redeployment is your fake word that means ABANDONMENT, which is your real hope and dream! Go Girl!! . . . Oh, yes, why do you stand for "honor killings" of Moslem women?
very sincerely yours, from an ex-liberal,
Miguel
Thank you for sending me your position on "redeployment". The length of my orig. message could have confused your staffer. I am a one-time very fervent democrat who did vote for you. Now, after learning much more and listening to you and the others of the demo attack machine, I realize the greatest enemy to the hopes, dreams and freedom of the Iraqi People is you and American liberals generally!
The nytimes indeed has expressed it's racist hatred for the Iraqi People daily now for years as it subjugates the good of Iraq to it's/your blind hatred for George Bush. You and the so-called journalist establishment, ABC, BBC, NBC, CBS, PBS, CNN, MSNBC, nytimes, latimes, etc. desperately want to hide the good news from Iraq and the good the US is doing there, and loudly trumpet al Qeada's message! I consider you to be an honorary member of al Qeada for your strenuous efforts on their behalf!
Now that I have become civilized and left the left, I wonder what it is that causes you to want so many innocent people to die at the hands of gunmen from the tenth century? Why you want to extend the rule of Saddam or his many clones there? Why you want to extend the tenth century cruelties toward women, Christians, Jews, all non-Moslems, gays, etc.? Why do you want to kill the weakest of Middle East minorities, using your friends, the tenth century gunmen, to do your killing for you? Essentially, why do you want to sacrifice the Iraqi People to these vicious killers (who would kill you in a heartbeat) when you . . . say you are a champion of women's rights? Is it that Iraqi women (and men) just don't count . . . that they are sub-human and it's just ok to let them die because, . . . "well, it's just easier that way?"
In my greater maturity, working with kids as a teacher I have learned more of what human rights truly are, as opposed to the shallow, reflexively politics based, well-meaning bullshit we "learned" in college. I now recognize you as an accomplice to mass murder . . you're like a surgeon who feels that the cancer has every right to live too, so it's just incorrect, politically incorrect, to operate, . . . so you say, "Hey, let's just let this one go, these Iraqi people aren't impotant; they can just die!" . . . their life and freedom do not serve your marxist god's world imeritives, do they?
We all know that "redeployment is your fake word that means ABANDONMENT, which is your real hope and dream! Go Girl!! . . . Oh, yes, why do you stand for "honor killings" of Moslem women?
very sincerely yours, from an ex-liberal,
Miguel
posted by lowjake at 8:28 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home